Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 0

Main Article Content

Abstract

Problem-Based Learning (PBL) and Project-Based Learning (PjBL) are instructional models that play a crucial role in developing students' skills and competencies. The implementation of PBL and PjBL has an impact on enhancing students' creativity and critical thinking abilities in achieving competencies that are relevant to the demands of the current era. This research aims to examine the relationship between creativity, critical thinking, and students' competencies in the field of vocational education through problem-based and project-based learning approaches. The research methodology employed is a qualitative approach with an exploratory study design. The research participants consist of 200 students majoring in Air Traffic Control in Vocational Aviation Education, comprising 70 final-year students, 70 intermediate-level students, and 60 entry-level students from aviation colleges with competencies in Aerodrome Flight Information Services (AFIS). The research instrument utilized is a questionnaire of the Measures of Typical Performance (MTP) type to gather student responses. The statistical analysis results using SEM-PLS reveal an R-Square value of 0.953 or 95%, indicating a significant relationship between creativity, critical thinking, and students' competencies in the field of vocational education.

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Arya Soeadyfa Fridyatama, D., Baskoro, F. ., & Maharani, M. . (2025). The PROBLEM BASED LEARNING AND PROJECT BASED LEARNING IN RELATION TO CREATIVITY AND CRITICAL THINKING TOWARDS THE COMPETENCE OF VOCATIONAL EDUCATION STUDENTS. Jurnal Penelitian, 10(3), 260–283. https://doi.org/10.46491/jp.v10i3.2051

References

  1. Abidin, Z., Utomo, A. C., Pratiwi, V., & Farokhah, L. (2020). Project-Based Learning
  2. - Literacy in Improving Students’ Mathematical Reasoning Abilities in
  3. Elementary Schools. JMIE (Journal of Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Education), 4(1),
  4. https://doi.org/10.32934/jmie.v4i1.170
  5. Alismail, H. A., & McGuire, P. (2015). 21st Century Standards and Curriculum:
  6. Current Research and Practice. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(6), 150–
  7. www.iiste.org
  8. Anggraeni, R. E., & Suratno. (2021). The analysis of the development of the 5ESTEAM learning model to improve critical thinking skills in natural science
  9. lesson. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1832(1), 012050.
  10. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1832/1/012050
  11. Caeiro-Rodriguez, M., Manso-Vazquez, M., Mikic-Fonte, F. A., Llamas-Nistal, M.,
  12. Fernandez-Iglesias, M. J., Tsalapatas, H., Heidmann, O., De Carvalho, C. V.,
  13. Jesmin, T., Terasmaa, J., & Sorensen, L. T. (2021). Teaching Soft Skills in
  14. Engineering Education: An European Perspective. IEEE Access, 9, 29222–
  15. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3059516
  16. Cargas, S., Williams, S., & Rosenberg, M. (2017). An approach to teaching critical
  17. thinking across disciplines using performance tasks with a common rubric.
  18. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 26, 24–37.
  19. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TSC.2017.05.005
  20. Chang, C. C., & Tseng, K. H. (2009). Using a Web-based portfolio assessment
  21. system to elevate project-based learning performances.
  22. Chistyakov, A. A., Zhdanov, S. P., Avdeeva, E. L., Dyadichenko, E. A., Kunitsyna,
  23. M. L., & Yagudina, R. I. (2023). Exploring the characteristics and effectiveness
  24. of project-based learning for science and STEAM education. Eurasia Journal
  25. of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(5), em2256.
  26. https://doi.org/10.29333/EJMSTE/13128
  27. Djumanova, B. (2021). ENHANCING CRITICAL THINKING OF STUDENTS IN
  28. CURRICULUM. Academic Research in Educational Sciences, 2(2), 1007.
  29. https://doi.org/10.24411/2181-1385-2021-00293
  30. Donaldson, S. I., & Grant-Vallone, E. J. (2002). Understanding self-report bias in
  31. organizational behavior research. Journal of Business and Psychology, 17(2),
  32. –260. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019637632584/METRICS
  33. Drigas, A., Drigas, A., & Mitsea, E. (2020). The 8 Pillars of Metacognition.
  34. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 15(21),
  35. –178.
  36. Fothergill, S., Loft, S., & Neal, A. (2009). ATC-labAdvanced: An air traffic control
  37. simulator with realism and control. Behavior Research Methods, 41(1), 118–
  38. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.1.118/METRICS
  39. Gallagher, S. A. (2015). The role of problem-based learning in developing creative
  40. expertise. Asia Pacific Education Review, 16(2), 225–235.
  41. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12564-015-9367-8/TABLES/2
  42. González-Manteiga, W., Crujeiras, R. M., González-Manteiga, W., & Crujeiras, R.
  43. M. (2013). An updated review of Goodness-of-Fit tests for regression models.
  44. TEST 2013 22:3, 22(3), 361–411. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11749-013-0327-5
  45. Gray, D. E. (David E. (2021). Doing Research in the Real World. Doing Research in
  46. the Real World, 1–100.
  47. Habók, A., & Nagy, J. (2016). In-service teachers’ perceptions of project-based
  48. learning. SpringerPlus, 5(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/S40064-016-1725-
  49. /FIGURES/7
  50. Hair, J., & Alamer, A. (2022). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling
  51. (PLS-SEM) in second language and education research: Guidelines using an applied example. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 1(3), 100027.
  52. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RMAL.2022.100027
  53. Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2014). Partial least
  54. squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in
  55. business research. European Business Review, 26(2), 106–121.
  56. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128/FULL/PDF
  57. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing
  58. discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal
  59. of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135.
  60. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11747-014-0403-8/FIGURES/8
  61. Herro, D., & Quigley, C. (2017). Exploring teachers’ perceptions of STEAM teaching
  62. through professional development: implications for teacher educators.
  63. Professional Development in Education, 43(3), 416–438.
  64. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2016.1205507
  65. Jain, N. (2021). Survey Versus Interviews: Comparing Data Collection Tools for
  66. Exploratory Research. The Qualitative Report. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-
  67. /2021.4492
  68. Kahu, E. R., & Nelson, K. (2018). Student engagement in the educational interface:
  69. understanding the mechanisms of student success. Higher Education
  70. Research & Development, 37(1), 58–71.
  71. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2017.1344197
  72. Kivunja, C. (2014). Do You Want Your Students to Be Job-Ready with 21st Century
  73. Skills? Change Pedagogies: A Pedagogical Paradigm Shift from Vygotskyian
  74. Social Constructivism to Critical Thinking, Problem Solving and Siemens’
  75. Digital Connectivism. International Journal of Higher Education, 3(3), 81–91.
  76. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v3n3p81
  77. Kivunja, C., & Kuyini, A. B. (2017). Understanding and Applying Research
  78. Paradigms in Educational Contexts. International Journal of Higher
  79. Education, 6(5), 26–41. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v6n5p26
  80. Koenen, A.-K., Dochy, F., & Berghmans, I. (2015). A phenomenographic analysis of
  81. the implementation of competence-based education in higher education.
  82. Teaching and Teacher Education, 50, 1–12.
  83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.04.001
  84. Kolmos, A., Egelund, J., Nicolaj, H. &, Clausen, R., Holgaard, J. E., & Clausen, N.
  85. R. (2020). Progression of student self-assessed learning outcomes in systemic
  86. PBL. Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/03043797.2020.1789070, 1–23.
  87. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2020.1789070
  88. Kopzhassarova, U., Akbayeva, G., Eskazinova, Z., Belgibayeva, G., & Tazhikeyeva,
  89. A. (2016). Enhancement of Students’ Independent Learning through Their
  90. Critical Thinking Skills Development. International Journal of Environmental
  91. and Science Education, 11(18), 11585–11592.
  92. Lassnigg, L. (2017). Competence-based Education and Educational Effectiveness
  93. (pp. 667–693). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41713-4_31
  94. Lowry, P. B., & Gaskin, J. (2014). Partial least squares (PLS) structural equation
  95. modeling (SEM) for building and testing behavioral causal theory: When to
  96. choose it and how to use it. IEEE Transactions on Professional
  97. Communication, 57(2), 123–146. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2014.2312452
  98. Medley, A. R., Powell, T., Worthington, A., Chohan, G., & Jones, C. (2010). Brain
  99. injury beliefs, self-awareness, and coping: A preliminary cluster analytic
  100. study based within the self-regulatory model.
  101. Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.1080/09602011.2010.517688, 20(6), 899–921.
  102. https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2010.517688
  103. Morton, K. L., Atkin, A. J., Corder, K., Suhrcke, M., & Sluijs, E. M. F. (2016). The
  104. school environment and adolescent physical activity and sedentary
  105. behaviour: a mixed‐studies systematic review. Obesity Reviews, 17(2), 142–
  106. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12352
  107. Muhammad, R., Yahya, M., Jamaluddin, J., & Purnamawati, P. (2021). Comparing
  108. project-based learning and problem-based learning to foster 21st-century
  109. learning skills in agricultural seaweed product. https://unpub.eu/ojs/index.php/cjes/article/view/5842
  110. Nadeem, M., Assistant, A., & Lecturer, S. S. (2012). A Comparison of Creative
  111. Thinking Abilities of High and Low Achievers Secondary School Students.
  112. International Interdisciplinary Journal of Education, 1(1), 3–8.
  113. Nilson, L. B. (2023). Nilson, L. B. (2023). Creating self-regulated learners: Strategies
  114. to strengthen students’ self-awareness and learning skills. Taylor & Francis.
  115. https://books.google.co.id/books?hl=en&lr=&id=fhHJEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&p
  116. g=PA34&dq=Students+need+to+have+mature+self
  117. Nilsook, P., Chatwattana, P., & Seechaliao, T. (2021). The Project-Based Learning
  118. Management Process for Vocational and Technical Education. Higher
  119. Education Studies, 11(2), 20–29. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v11n2p20
  120. Otto, S., & Pensini, P. (2017). Nature-based environmental education of children:
  121. Environmental knowledge and connectedness to nature, together, are related
  122. to ecological behaviour. Global Environmental Change, 47, 88–94.
  123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.09.009
  124. Remijan, K. W. (2017). Project-Based Learning and Design-Focused Projects to
  125. Motivate Secondary Mathematics Students. Interdisciplinary Journal of
  126. Problem-Based Learning, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1520
  127. Sari, D. M. M., & Prasetyo, Y. (2021). Project-based-learning on critical reading
  128. course to enhance critical thinking skills. Studies in English Language and
  129. Education, 8(2), 442–456. https://doi.org/10.24815/SIELE.V8I2.18407
  130. Savery, J. R. (2015). Essential Readings in Problem-based Learning.
  131. https://books.google.co.id/books?hl=en&lr=&id=KhFBgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA5&dq=The+application+of+critical+thinking+in+
  132. learning+refers+to+a+deeper+understanding+of+theory,+evidence,+and+sign
  133. ificant+issues+through+a+scientific+approach+and+the+application+of+
  134. Siew, N. M., Amir, N., & Chong, C. L. (2015). The perceptions of pre-service and inservice teachers regarding a project-based STEM approach to teaching
  135. science. SpringerPlus, 4(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-4-
  136. /TABLES/4
  137. Şimşek, G. G., & Noyan, F. (2013). McDonald’s ωt, Cronbach’s α, and Generalized
  138. θ for Composite Reliability of Common Factors Structures.
  139. Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.1080/03610918.2012.689062, 42(9), 2008–2025.
  140. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610918.2012.689062
  141. Snyder, L. G., & Snyder, M. J. (2008). Teaching Critical Thinking and Problem
  142. Solving Skills How Critical Thinking Relates to Instructional Design. The
  143. Delta Pi Epsilon Journal, 1(2), 90–100.
  144. Spector, J. M., & Ma, S. (2019). Inquiry and critical thinking skills for the next
  145. generation: from artificial intelligence back to human intelligence. Smart
  146. Learning Environments, 6(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-019-0088-z
  147. Spector, P. E., & Fox, S. (2002). An emotion-centered model of voluntary work
  148. behavior. Human Resource Management Review, 12(2), 269–292.
  149. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-4822(02)00049-9
  150. Ulger, K. (2018). The Effect of Problem-Based Learning on the Creative Thinking
  151. and Critical Thinking Disposition of Students in Visual Arts Education.
  152. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 12(1).
  153. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1649
  154. Updegrove, J. A., & Jafer, S. (2017). Optimization of Air Traffic Control Training at
  155. the Federal Aviation Administration Academy. Aerospace 2017, Vol. 4, Page
  156. , 4(4), 50. https://doi.org/10.3390/AEROSPACE4040050
  157. van Laar, E., van Deursen, A. J. A. M., van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & de Haan, J. (2020).
  158. Measuring the levels of 21st-century digital skills among professionals
  159. working within the creative industries: A performance-based approach.
  160. Poetics, 81, 101434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2020.101434
  161. Vogler, J. S., Thompson, P., Davis, D. W., Mayfield, B. E., Finley, P. M., & Yasseri,
  162. D. (2018). The hard work of soft skills: augmenting the project-based learning
  163. experience with interdisciplinary teamwork. Instructional Science, 46(3), 457–
  164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-017-9438-9
  165. Yang, Y. T. C., & Wu, W. C. I. (2012). Digital storytelling for enhancing student
  166. academic achievement, critical thinking, and learning motivation: A year-long
  167. experimental study. Computers & Education, 59(2), 339–352.
  168. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPEDU.2011.12.012
  169. Yazar Soyadı, B. B. (2015). Creative and Critical Thinking Skills in Problem-based
  170. Learning Environments. Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity, 2(2), 71–
  171. https://doi.org/10.18200/jgedc.2015214253