Main Article Content

Abstract

Tingkat pemahaman ilmu material teknik bagi mahasiswa teknik masih kurang dan perlu ditingkatkan. Peningkatan kemampuan belajar mahasiswa dinilai sangat penting untuk menunjang mutu lulusan teknik secara umum. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui determinan prioritas yang perlu dikembangkan guna meningkatkan kinerja pembelajaran ilmu material teknik di perguruan tinggi swasta. Metodologi penelitian menggunakan metode analisis campuran. Data primer penelitian ini diperoleh melalui teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan kuesioner dan wawancara. Pengujian hipotesis menggunakan analisis statistik dengan bantuan program Microsoft Excel. Penelitian ini menemukan bahwa tingkat pemahaman belajar selama sekolah menengah sangat menentukan keberhasilan pembelajaran ilmu material teknik di perguruan tinggi (67%), sedangkan sisanya (33%) merupakan tantangan lanjutan selama kuliah. Simpulan penelitian ini adalah tingkat kemampuan belajar mahasiswa sangat mempengaruhi mutu lulusan teknik di perguruan tinggi.

Article Details

How to Cite
Subawi, H., Azhari, M. C. ., & Hartono. (2025). IMPLEMENTASI PENGAJARAN DAN PEMBELAJARAN MATA KULIAH MATERIAL TEKNIK TERHADAP CAPAIAN MAHASISWA PERGURUAN TINGGI SWASTA DI BANDUNG . Jurnal Penelitian, 10(2), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.46491/jp.v10i2.2024

References

  1. Alarcon, D.A.U., F. Talavera-Mendoza, F.H.R. Paucar, K.S.C. Caceres, & R.M. Viza. “Science
  2. and inquiry-based teaching and learning: a systematic review”. Facultad de Ciencias de la
  3. Educación. Universidad Nacional de San Agustín de Arequipa – Perú, (2023).
  4. Almufarreh, A., & M.Arshad. “Promising emerging technologies for teaching and learning:
  5. recent developments and future challenges”. Sustainability 15.6917 (2023).
  6. Andrews, T.C., N.M. Speer, & G.V. Shultz. “Building bridges: a review and synthesis
  7. of research on teaching knowledge for undergraduate instruction in science,
  8. engineering, and mathematics”. International Journal of STEM Education 9.66 (2022).
  9. Bozzi, M., R. Mazzola, I. Testa, J. E. Raffaghelli, & M. Zani. “Educational innovation in higher
  10. education: engineering students’ experiences of Emergency Remote Teaching”. Cogent
  11. Education 11.1 (2024).
  12. Caeiro-Rodríguez, M., M. Manso-Vázquez, F.A. Mikic-Fonte, M. Lamas-Nistal, M.J.
  13. Fernández-Iglesias, H. Tsalapatas, O. Heidmann, C.V.D. Carvalho, T. Jesmin, J. Terasmaa, & L.T. Sørensen. “Teaching Soft Skills in Engineering Education: A European
  14. Perspective”. IEEE Education Society Section 9 (2021): 29222-242.
  15. Fahadi, M., & Khan, M.S.H. “Technology-enhanced teaching in engineering education:
  16. Teachers’ knowledge construction using TPACK framework”. International Journal of
  17. Instruction 15.2 (2022): 519-542.
  18. Hammack, R., I.H. Yeter, C. Pavlovich, & T. Boz. “Pre-service elementary teachers’ science
  19. and engineering teaching self-efficacy and outcome expectancy: exploring the impacts
  20. of efficacy source experiences through varying course modalities”. International Journal
  21. of STEM Education, Springer 11.4 (2024).
  22. Menekse, M. “Envisioning the future of learning and teaching engineering in the artificial
  23. intelligence era: Opportunities and challenges”. American Society for Engineering
  24. Education, Journal of Engineering Education (2023): 1–5.
  25. Mlambo, P.B. “Instructional practices by engineering graphics and design teachers: A focus
  26. on teaching and learning of isometric drawing”. Research in Social Sciences and
  27. Technology 9.2 (2024): 359-376.
  28. Moloi, M.J., & A.T. Motlhabane. “Curriculum integration of physical sciences, engineering
  29. science, technology subjects in relation to the technical sciences curriculum”. South
  30. African Journal of Education 43.2 (2023).
  31. OECD. “Education Policy Outlook: Reshaping Teaching into a Thriving Profession from ABCs to A”I.
  32. OECD Publishing, Paris (2024).
  33. Picardal, M.T., & J.M.P. Sanchez. “Effectiveness of contextualization in science instruction to
  34. enhance science literacy in the Philippines: a meta-analysis”. International Journal of
  35. Learning, Teaching and Educational Research 21.1 (2023): 140-156.
  36. Saro, J.M., J.C. Oquilan, E.E. Basigsig, R.C.B. Castillo, & J.V. Lastra. “A comprehensive review:
  37. transforming science education in the pearl of the orient-innovations in teaching
  38. approaches and technology integration”. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary
  39. Journal 14 (2023): 1122-1131.
  40. Streltsova, M., L. Gladkova, & J. Bulygina. “Implementing smart technology in engineering
  41. education”. E3S Web of Conferences 376 (2023).
  42. Sustiningsih, S. Utaminingsih, & Santoso. “Development of science teaching materials based on
  43. STEM: A needs analysis”. UPINCASE 2020 Journal of Physics: IOP Publishing (2021).
  44. Yeap, K.H. “Teaching pedagogy for engineering education”. Journal – The Institution of
  45. Engineers, Malaysia 82.2 (2023).