EVALUATION OF PAVEMENT CONDITION ON THE RUNWAY USING THE PAVEMENT CONDITION INDEX (PCI) METHOD AT DEPATI PARBO KERINCI AIRPORT, JAMBI PROVINCE

Authors

  • Nabil Tajuddin Politeknik Penerbangan Surabaya
  • Siti Fatimah Politeknik Penerbangan Surabaya
  • Linda Winiasri Politeknik Penerbangan Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46491/icateas.v3i1.1906

Keywords:

Pavement, Runway, Pavement Condition Index, Pavement Management System, Budget Plan

Abstract

Depati Parbo Airport features a runway measuring 1,600 meters in *Corresponding Author length and 30 meters in width with a PCN value of 22 F/C/Y/T. Regular maintenance and upkeep are required to support airside safety, documented through Pavement Management System (PMS) reports. This maintenance program is also driven by the increasing flight traffic expected in 2024, necessitating an analysis of the level of damage and appropriate repair methods. The analysis used is the PCI method to determine the condition of the runway surface. This method is adopted from the ASTM document about KP 94, 2015 on Airport Pavement Construction Maintenance. Each total area of damage (quantity) found is used as a determinant of density to find the deduct value from the graph, then determine the correct deduct value from the correlation with the total deduct value and obtain the PCI value for each sample. The analysis resulted in a PCI value of 96.2% with the "Good" category, indicating damages such as bleeding, longitudinal and transversal cracking, and potholes. A Cost Estimate Plan is prepared for maintenance work consisting of patching medium-level pothole damages at STA 0+572 and several bleeding damages covering an area of 57,442 m², requiring repair costs amounting to Rp. 31,026,000.00.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-06

How to Cite

Tajuddin, N. ., Fatimah, S., & Winiasri, L. (2024). EVALUATION OF PAVEMENT CONDITION ON THE RUNWAY USING THE PAVEMENT CONDITION INDEX (PCI) METHOD AT DEPATI PARBO KERINCI AIRPORT, JAMBI PROVINCE. Proceeding of International Conference of Advanced Transportation, Engineering, and Applied Social Science, 3(1), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.46491/icateas.v3i1.1906