The Effect of Aviation Security Officers’ Supervision Intensity and the Clarity of Prohibited Items Information on Passenger Compliance Related to Prohibited Items at Juanda International Airport

Authors

  • Ni Kadek Yocha Aditya Maharani a:1:{s:5:"en_US";s:31:"Politeknik Penerbangan Surabaya";}
  • Muhammad Arif Zikir Risky PGRI Dewantara Institute of Technology and Business, Jombang, Indonesia
  • Dimas Arya Soeadyfa Fridyatama Aviation Polytechnic of Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46491/approach.v9i2.2551

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effect of Aviation Security officers’ supervision intensity and the clarity of prohibited items information on passenger compliance related to prohibited items at Juanda International Airport. Although previous studies have examined airport security culture, passenger awareness, screening performance, and communication effectiveness separately, limited research has investigated the combined influence of Aviation Security officers’ supervision intensity and the clarity of prohibited items information on passenger compliance, particularly in the context of Indonesian airports. This research addresses this gap by integrating both variables into a single analytical model. A quantitative approach employing Partial Least Squares–Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) was used to examine the relationships among the variables. Data were collected through questionnaires distributed to 100 departing passengers at Terminal 1 of Juanda International Airport using an accidental sampling technique. The results indicate that the supervision intensity of Aviation Security officers has a positive and significant effect on passenger compliance, with a path coefficient of 0.540 and a significance value below 0.05. The clarity of prohibited items information also has a positive and significant effect on passenger compliance, with a path coefficient of 0.608, indicating a more dominant influence. Simultaneously, both variables explain 66.8% of the variance in passenger compliance. The novelty of this study lies in the integration of supervision intensity and prohibited items information clarity within a single PLS-SEM model to explain passenger compliance in the Indonesian airport context, providing empirical evidence that effective supervision and clear information delivery should be implemented simultaneously to strengthen aviation security compliance. These findings offer both theoretical contributions to aviation security research and practical recommendations for airport authorities to improve passenger compliance through integrated supervision and communication strategies.

References

Adenigbo, A. J. (2024). Assessment of airport security culture in Nigeria. Journal of Transportation Security, 17(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12198-024-00273-9

Ahmed, A. (2024). Complex Aviation Systems Equipment Evaluation and Selection: Case Study of Airport Outbound Hold-Baggage Processing Systems (Versi 1, hlm. 3948512 Bytes) [RMIT University]. https://doi.org/10.25439/RMT.29443256

Alketbi, K., & Sipos, A. (2024). The role of smart technology in airport facilitation and security control (ICAO Annex 9 and 17 requirements). Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Development, 8(8), 5444. https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i8.5444

Ayyub, S., & Rohmah, Z. (2024). The linguistic landscape of Kotabaru Malang Train Station: Language representation in public space. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 11(1), 2389633. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2389633

Bartulović, D., Gagula, A., Mićić, A., & Vidović, A. (2025). Impact analysis of dangerous goods-related aviation accidents on safety regulations and operational procedures. Transportation Research Procedia, 91, 21–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2025.10.004

Darjono, W., Arinta, F. K., Zalmansyah, A., Muhammad Rasyid, F., & Sitti Aminah. (2025). EFFECTIVENESS OF AIRPORT FUNCTION SEPARATION IN INDONESIA: A CASE STUDY OF SOEKARNO-HATTA AND HALIM PERDANAKUSUMA AIRPORTS, WITH A PROPOSAL FOR UTILIZING KERTAJATI AIRPORT FOR PRIVATE AVIATION. PLANNING MALAYSIA, 23. https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v23i39.1903

Dewa Made Frendika Septanaya, I., Gde Ariastita, P., & Ista Anindya, A. (2025). Assessing the Alignment of Spatial Planning Directives and Aviation Safety and Security Aviation Operations within the Airport Public Safety Zone (PSZ): A Case Study at Iswahjudi Military Airport, Indonesia. International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development, 13(2), 235–260. https://doi.org/10.14246/irspsd.13.2_235

Eleimat, M., & Őszi, A. (2025). Cybersecurity in Aviation: Exploring the Significance, Applications, and Challenges of Cybersecurity in the Aviation Sector. Periodica Polytechnica Transportation Engineering, 53(2), 169–183. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPtr.37153

Hwang, I., & Seo, R. (2025). Mitigating security stress: Exploring the contingent role of collaborative communication in enhancing information security compliance. Computers & Security, 151, 104326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2025.104326

Kim, M. H., Park, J. W., & Choi, Y. J. (2020). A Study on the Effects of Waiting Time for Airport Security Screening Service on Passengers’ Emotional Responses and Airport Image. Sustainability, 12(24), 10634. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410634

Latscha, M., Schwaninger, A., Sauer, J., & Sterchi, Y. (2024). Performance of X-ray baggage screeners in different work environments: Comparing remote and local cabin baggage screening. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 102, 103598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2024.103598

Mukhtar, A. P., Rachmadi, R. F., & Mukti, P. H. (2023). Knowledge Management Readiness In The Airport Industry: The Case of Juanda International Airport, Indonesia. 2023 International Electronics Symposium (IES), 388–393. https://doi.org/10.1109/IES59143.2023.10242438

Ogonowski, K., Nowak, J., Achimowicz, J., & Biernacki, R. (2020). Protection of Air Transport Against Acts of Unlawful Interference. Safety & Defense, 6(2), 75–88. https://doi.org/10.37105/sd.89

Pinem, Y. A., Gultom, M. A., & Sari, N. R. (2024). Language and Identity of Aviation Security. Jurnal Manajemen Dirgantara, 17(2), 429–437. https://doi.org/10.56521/manajemen-dirgantara.v17i2.1277

Poberezhna, Z. (2021). DYNAMICS OF INFLUENCE OF COMPONENTS OF THE EXTERNAL ENVIRONMENT OF AVIATION ENTERPRISES FUNCTIONING IN COMPETITIVE MARKETS. Three Seas Economic Journal, 2(3), 87–94. https://doi.org/10.30525/2661-5150/2021-3-12

Rahman, W., Kanwar, D., & Shaikh, S. (2025). Unlawful interference at airports: Hijacking, bombing, cybercrime and integrated countermeasures. International Journal of Criminal, Common and Statutory Law, 5(2), 112–117. https://doi.org/10.22271/27899497.2025.v5.i2b.154

Shin, R. H. (2024). A Study on Passengers’ Safety Awareness Regarding Items Carried on Board Aircraft. Journal of the Korean Society for Aviation and Aeronautics, 32(3), 215–225. https://doi.org/10.12985/ksaa.2024.32.3.215

Stotz, T., Bearth, A., Ghelfi, S. M., & Siegrist, M. (2021). Keep the status quo: Randomization-based security checks might reduce crime deterrence at airports. Journal of Risk Research, 24(12), 1589–1604. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2021.1894469

Uchroński, P. (2020). Assessment of the impact of the restricted areas access control management on the airport security system. WUT Journal of Transportation Engineering, 129, 101–112. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0014.4407

Walter, S., Schmutz, J. B., & Grote, G. (2024). A Safety Approach for Improving Security—Effective Coordination Strategies at the Airport Security Screening Checkpoint. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 66(4), 1302–1314. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208221121411

Wulandari, M. P., Ardianto, B., & Yin, T. X. (2025). Body Scanners at Airports: The Dilemma between Aviation Security and Passenger Privacy Rights. Uti Possidetis: Journal of International Law, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.22437/up.v6i1.37198

Downloads

Published

2026-09-15