Article Sidebar

Submitted
Mar 13, 2026
Published
Jun 2, 2026
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 7 Download : 2

Main Article Content

Abstract

The naming of the Standard Instrument Departure (SID) at Seahorse Airport is a crucial element in the learning process of Aerodrome Control Procedure (ADC) and Approach Control procedure (APP). This study aims to validate the naming of the SID at Seahorse Airport as a learning media for ADC and APP. Although it plays an important role in improving cadets’ understanding and skills, the implementation of SID at the Surabaya Aviation Polytechnic has not been optimal, as cadets still prepare ATC Clearance manually. This research refers to ICAO Doc 4444 on Air Traffic Management and the principles of SID implementation at other airports. The research method used is Research and Development (R&D) with the ADDIE model (Analysis – Design – Development – Implementation – Evaluation). A literature review was also conducted to examine the relevance and effectiveness of SID in the context of safety and clear communication in ATC. The results indicate that the designed SID naming has been validated by several experts and has proven effective in enhancing students' understanding. Training simulations using the SID naming show a significant improvement in communication efficiency and students' skills. The SID naming is expected to be integrated into the curriculum to enhance the quality of aviation education.

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

  1. Ahmad, A., Dalimunthe, B., Rosmayanti, L., Sukra, R., Penerbangan, P., & Curug, I. (2024).
  2. PENGARUH AIR TRAFFIC SERVICE SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM TERHADAP PELAYANAN
  3. LALU LINTAS PENERBANGAN DI AIRNAV INDONESIA CABANG MEDAN. JOURNAL OF
  4. SCIENCE AND SOCIAL RESEARCH, 7(4), 1664–1675. DOI :
  5. https://doi.org/10.54314/JSSR.V7I4.2294
  6. Amalia, I., Hasanah, U., Islam Negeri Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten Jl Syekh Nawawi Al-Bantani
  7. No, U., & Serang Banten, C. (2021). Developing an Intercultural-Based Text Book for Teaching
  8. Writing. Loquen: English Studies Journal, 14(2), 64–76. DOI :
  9. https://doi.org/10.32678/LOQUEN.V14I2.4959
  10. Aminarno. (2015). No bird soars too high if he soars with his own wings.
  11. Bikir, A., Idrissi, O., Mansouri, K., & Qbadou, M. (2024). An Optimized Air Traffic Departure Sequence
  12. According to the Standard Instrument Departures. International Journal of Advanced Computer
  13. Science and Applications, 15(3), 1364. DOI : 10.14569/IJACSA.2024.01503133
  14. Cahyadi, C. I., Gusti, I., Ayu, A., Oka, M., & Masito, F. (2022). The Importance of Aviation Vocational
  15. Education in Indonesia. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(2), 1869–1878. DOI :
  16. https://doi.org/10.35445/ALISHLAH.V14I2.1257
  17. Chandra, A., Choubey, N., Verma, A., & Sooraj, K. (2024). Quasi-Stochastic Departure Metering Model
  18. Considering Non-Deterministic Taxi Time, Standard Instrument Departure Track Time, and a
  19. New Delay–Conflict Relationship. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation
  20. Research Board. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981241240761
  21. Diffenderfer, P. A., Long, K. M., & Wilkins, S. A. (2018a). Concepts for delivering IFR clearances &
  22. exchanging pre-departure data using mobile devices. ICNS 2018 - Integrated Communications,
  23. Navigation, Surveillance Conference, 3I11-3I19. DOI :
  24. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNSURV.2018.8384878
  25. E. Clarke, O. Grumberg, S. Jha, et al., Counterexample-guided abstraction refinement, in: E.A. Emerson,
  26. A.P. Sistla (Eds.), Computer Aided Verification, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2000, pp. 154–169.
  27. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/10722167_15
  28. Diffenderfer, P. A., Long, K. M., & Wilkins, S. A. (2018b). Using mobile devices for IFR clearance
  29. delivery and release and data exchange. 2018 Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations
  30. Conference. DOI : https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2018-3350
  31. Guo, T., Mei, Y., Tang, K., & Du, W. (2023). A Knee-Guided Evolutionary Algorithm for MultiObjective
  32. Air Traffic Flow Management. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation. DOI :
  33. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEVC.2023.3281810
  34. Gyles, D., & Bearman, C. (2017). Managing safety in the air traffic control terminal airspace. Cognition,
  35. Technology and Work, 19(1), 143– 159. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/S10111-017-0403-
  36. /FIGURES/7
  37. ICAO. (2016). Doc 4444- Air Traffic Management - Procedures for Air Navigation Services. In Air Traffic
  38. Management - Procedures or Air Navigation Services (Issue 16). DOI :
  39. https://ops.group/blog/wpcontent/uploads/2017/03/ICAO-Doc4444-Pans-Atm-16thEdition-2016-
  40. PSGROUP.pdf
  41. Martin, A., Strzempkowski, B., Young, S., Fontecchio, A. K., & Delaine, D. A. (2020). Air traffic control
  42. (ATC) technical training collaboration for the advancement of global harmonization. Journal of
  43. Air Transport Management, 89, 101794. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JAIRTRAMAN.2020.1
  44. Sugiyono, P. D. (2013). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D.